p. 9−24
2538-5623
Vol.3/No.9
p. 25−40
2538-5623
Vol.3/No.9
p. 41−52
2538-5623
Vol.3/No.9
p. 53−66
2538-5623
Vol.3/No.9
p. 67−86
2538-5623
Vol.3/No.9
p. 87−102
2538-5623
Vol.3/No.9
p. 103−116
2538-5623
Vol.3/No.9
0/001) are given in the post-test, post hoc test, showed that both treatment groups had a significant effect (at P>0/001) in reducing symptoms. But the effectiveness of neurofeedback group was significantly higher than verbal self instruction. Conclusions: Both methods have efficiency in reduce of attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder symptoms, but the effectiveness of neurofeedback is higher than verbal self instruction. Mechanism of this effect is probably due to altered cognitive functions such as Inhibition.]]>
p. 117−132
2538-5623
Vol.3/No.9
p. 133−146
2538-5623
Vol.3/No.9