Payame Noor University Neuropsychology 2476-5023 6 20 2020 05 21 Comparing the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy and Neurofeedback Training on Improving the Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer Comparing the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy and Neurofeedback Training on Improving the Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer 63 82 6758 10.30473/clpsy.2020.46216.1439 FA Sanaz Elahi Nejad PhD Student in Psychology, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. Shahrokh Makvand Hosseini Assistant professor of Psychology, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. 0000-0002-4846-3499 Parviz Sabahi Associate professor of Psychology, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. Journal Article 2019 05 15 <strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of two therapeutic methods of reality therapy and neurofeedback to improve the quality of life of breast cancer women. <strong>Methods:</strong> In a semi-experimental design, a number of 45 breast cancer patients were selected by the available sampling methods in 2018 in Amol city and randomly divided into three equal groups. Inform consent provided and inclusion/exclusion criteria were controlled for. The QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 instruments in three stages of pretest, posttest and two months follow-up completed by all subjects. The first and second groups respectively were received the reality therapy and neurofeedback separately, while no intervention administered on the third group. Research data were analyzed using a multivariate analysis of covariance. <strong>Findings:</strong> Significant differences were found between the experimental groups and the waiting list group for the quality of life variables(p <strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of two therapeutic methods of reality therapy and neurofeedback to improve the quality of life of breast cancer women. <strong>Methods:</strong> In a semi-experimental design, a number of 45 breast cancer patients were selected by the available sampling methods in 2018 in Amol city and randomly divided into three equal groups. Inform consent provided and inclusion/exclusion criteria were controlled for. The QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 instruments in three stages of pretest, posttest and two months follow-up completed by all subjects. The first and second groups respectively were received the reality therapy and neurofeedback separately, while no intervention administered on the third group. Research data were analyzed using a multivariate analysis of covariance. <strong>Findings:</strong> Significant differences were found between the experimental groups and the waiting list group for the quality of life variables(p https://clpsy.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_6758_2e91985cc2ff5d48fea9bca2282803b6.pdf