In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iran Neuropsychology Association

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 PhD student in Linguistics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor of Speech Therapy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Linguistics, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor of Speech Therapy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Aim: The present study aims to translate and determine the validity and reliability of the Annette's Handedness Test according to the language and culture of the Turkish people of Azerbaijan. Method: initially the twelve items of the test were translated and or their equivalents were made according to the language and culture of the Turkish people. Two qualitative (CVR) and quantitative (CVI) indexes were used for the determination of content validity of the translated and made options in which the expert panel was concluded 20 Turkish linguists and psychologists. Based on this, according to the Lawshe’s Sampling Decision Table (Hajizadeh, 2011) options higher than 0.42 were selected for CVR content validity and options higher than 0.79 for CVI content validity.Findings: The Turkish version of the made test was performed on 2654 person and 663 of them were retested (ICC=0.99). Internal consistency analysis (Cronbach’s alpha) showed that the validity of the entire test options was above 0.99 and the results showed that 90.69% of participants were right-handed, 8.25% left-handed and 1.05% two-handed.Conclusion: the Turkish version of the test has suitable reliability and validity.
 
 

Keywords

حاجی­زاده، الف؛ اصغری م.(1390).روش­های و تحلیل­های آماری با نگاه به روش تحقیق در علوم زیستی و  بهداشتی، جهاد دانشگاهی، چاپ اول
علی­پور، الف؛ آگاه­هریس،م.(1385). بررسی قابلیت اعتماد و اعتبار پرسشنامه دست برتری چاپمن در کودکان، فصلنامه روانشناسان ایرانی. شماره 7، 197-205.
علی­پور، الف؛ امینی، ف؛ ذکاوت، ح.(1394). مقایسه مولفه­های خلاقیت بین دانش­آموزان راست دست، چپ دست و دوسوتوان ، فصلنامة علمی پژوهشی عصب-روانشناسی. شماره 1، 87-101.
محمدی، ش؛ مهری، ف؛ سعیدمنش، م.(1397). اثربخشی تمرینات دست برتری بر زبان بیانی و دریافتی کودکان دراری اختلاف طیف اوتیسم، فصلنامة علمی پژوهشی عصب-روانشناسی. شماره 3، 23-36.
آدلر، وانداک، وب. نورولوژی آسیب شناسی گفتار و زبان. ترجمه رضائی،بهاره؛ رهبر،سولماز؛ رضائی،محمد(1390). انتشارات رویان پژوه.
 Annett, M. (1970). A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 303-321.
Annett, M. (1985). Left, right, hand and brain: The right shift theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bishop, D.V.M. (2001). Individual Differences in Handedness and Specific Speech and Language Impairment: Evidence against a Genetic Link. Behavior Genetics, 31(4).
Bishop, D.V.M., Ross, V.A., Daniels, M.S. &Bright, P. (1996). The measurement of hand preference: A validation study comparing three groups of right-handers. British Journal of Psychology, 67,269285.
Chapman, L.J., and Chapman, J.P. (1987). The measurement of handedness. Brain and Cognition, 6: 175183.
Gazzaniga, M.S., Ivery, R.B. &Mangun, G.R. (2002). Cognitive Neuroscience. USA: W.W. Norton & Company.
Ghayas, S. & Adil, A. (2007). “Effect of Handedness on Intelligence Level of Students”. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology. 33(1): 85-91.
Noroozian, M, Lotfi, J, Gassemzadeh, H., Emami, M. & Mehrabi, Y. (2002). Academic achievement and learning abilities in left-handers: guilt or gift?. Cortex, 38, 779-785.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-l 13.Pinel, J.P. (2000). Biopsychology. (4Edition). USA: Allyn &Bacon.
Pinel, J. (2001).Biopsychology. Boston: Allyn and Bakon.