الگوی امواج مغزی در باورهای فراطبیعی : مطالعه ای مبتنی بر EEG در گروه های شدید و خفیف

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری علوم شناختی، پژوهشکده علوم شناختی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار روانشناسی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

3 دانشیار روانشناسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

10.30473/clpsy.2020.48062.1455

چکیده

 
مقدمه: هدف این تحقیق بررسی الگوی امواج مغزی در باورهای فراطبیعی با استفاده از EEG در گروه های شدید و خفیف بوده است . روش: شصت و چهار نفر( 18زن) با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و با استفاده از مقیاس باورهای فراطبیعی بلکمور(1994) به‌عنوان گروه‌­های دارای باورفراطبیعی شدید و خفیف تقسیم شدند. EEG ازشرکت­ کنندگان دو گروه در حالت استراحت ثبت شد. یافته ها: یافته ها نشان داد که تفاوت معنی­داری بین گروه­های باورهای فراطبیعی خفیف و باورهای فراطبیعی در موج دلتا (sig=0,01) و تتا (sig=0.03) وجود دارد و موج آلفا (sig=0.08) در مرز معناداری است..نتیجه ­گیری: بر اساس این یافته­ ها می­توان گفت که الگوی امواج مغزی در باورهای فراطبیعی متفاوت است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Brainwave Pattern in Paranormal Beliefs: An EEG-based study in Severe and Mild groups

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdolvahed Narmashiri 1
  • ahmad sohrabi 2
  • Javad Hatami 3
1 Ph.D. Student in Cognitive Science,Institute for Cognitive SciencesStudies,Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Psychology, University of Kordestan,.Sanandaj, Iran.
3 Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran .Iran.
چکیده [English]

Aim  The purpose of this study was to investigate the pattern of brain waves in paranormal beliefs using EEG in severe and mild groups.Methods: A convenient sample of 64 university students (18 females) were recruited for the experiment. they were divided into groups with severe and mildly paranormal beliefs using the Supernatural Beliefs Scale (Belkmore,1994). EEG of participants in both groups was recorded at rest. Results: The result of MANOVA showed a significant difference between mild paranormal and paranormal beliefs in Delta (sig = 0.01) and Theta (sig = 0.03) waves, and alpha wave (sig = 0.08) in the meaningful boundary.Conclusion: Based on these findings, it can be said that the pattern of brain waves in paranormal beliefs is different.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Paranormal Beliefs
  • EEG
  • Delta
  • Theta
  • Alpha
  • Beta
  • Brainwave
Acharya, U. R., Hagiwara, Y., Deshpande, S. N., Suren, S., Koh, J. E. W., Oh, S. L., ... & Lim, C. M. (2018). Characterization of focal EEG signals: a review. Future Generation Computer Systems.

Alipour, A. And Agah Harris, M. (2007). "Reliability and Validity of Edinburgh Handwriting Questionnaire in Iran". Journal of Psychological Sciences. 6 (22): 117-133.(Persian)

Beeman, M., Chiarello, C., 1998. Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

Blackmore, S., & Moore, R. (1994). Seeing things: Visual recognition and belief in the paranormal. European Journal of Parapsychology10, 91-103.

Broks, P., 1984. Schizotypy and hemisphere function-11. Performance asymmetry on verbal divided visual-field tasks. Personality and Individual Differences 5, 649-656.

Brugger, P. (2001). From haunted brain to haunted science. Hauntings and poltergeists: multidisciplinary perspectives. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 175-213.

Brugger, P., & Mohr, C. (2008). The paranormal mind: How the study of anomalous experiences and beliefs may inform cognitive neuroscience. Cortex44(10), 1291.

Brugger, P., & Mohr, C. (2008). The paranormal mind: How the study of anomalous experiences and beliefs may inform cognitive neuroscience. Cortex, 44(10), 1291.

Brugger, P., & Taylor, K. I. (2003). ESP: extrasensory perception or effect of subjective probability?. Journal of Consciousness Studies10(6-7), 221-246.

Brugger, P., Gamma, A,, Muri, R., Schafer, M., Taylor, K., 1993a. Functional hemispheric asymmetry and belief in ESP: towards a ‘neuropsychology of belief‘. Perceptual and Motor Skills 77, 1299-1308.

Brugger, P., Graves, R.E., 1997a. Right hemispatial inattention and magical ideation. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 247, 55-57.

Brugger, P., Graves, R.E., 1997b. Testing vs. believing hypotheses: magical ideation in the judgements of contingencies. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2, 251-272.

Brugger, P., Regard, M., Landis, T., Cook, N., Krebs, D., & Niederberger, J. (1993). ‘Meaningful’patterns in visual noise: Effects of lateral stimulation and the observer’s belief in ESP. Psychopathology26(5-6), 261-265.

Brugger, P., Regard, M., Landis, T., Cook, N., Krebs, D., & Niederberger, J. (1993). ‘Meaningful’patterns in visual noise: Effects of lateral stimulation and the observer’s belief in ESP. Psychopathology26(5-6), 261-265.

Brugger, P., Regard, M., Landis, T., Cook, N., Krebs, D., Niederberger, J., 1993b. ‘Meaningful’ patterns in visual noise: effects of lateral stimulation and the observer’s belief in ESP. Psychopathology 26, 261-265.

Crow, T.J., 1997. Schizophrenia as failure of hemispheric dominance for language. Trends in Neuroscience 20, 339-343.

Dagnall, N., Denovan, A., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., & Clough, P. J. (2017). Urban legends and paranormal beliefs: the role of reality testing and schizotypy. Frontiers in psychology8, 942.

 Dickey, C.C., McCarley, R.W., Voglmaier, M.M, Niznikiewicz, M.A., Seidman, L.J., Hirayasu, Y., Fischer, I., Teh, E.K., an Rhoads, R., Jakab, M., Kikinis, R., Jolesz, F.A., Shenton, M.E., 1999. Schizotypal personality disorder and MRI abnormalities of temporal lobe gray matter. Biological Psychiatry 45, 1393-1402.

Flecka,l . Greenb,L.. Stevensond,L. Edward, M & At all. (2008).The transliminal brain at rest: Baseline EEG, unusual experiences, and access to unconscious mental activity.cortex,441353-1363.

Gianotti, L. R., Mohr, C., Pizzagalli, D., Lehmann, D., & Brugger, P. (2001). Associative processing and paranormal belief. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences55(6), 595-603.

Irwin, H. J. (2009). The psychology of paranormal belief: A researcher's handbook. Univ of Hertfordshire Press.

Irwin, H. J., Dagnall, N., & Drinkwater, K. (2012). Paranormal belief and biases in reasoning underlying the formation of delusions. Australian Journal of Parapsychology12(1), 7.

Leonhard, D., Brugger, P., 1998. Creative, paranormal, and delusional thought: a consequence of right hemisphere semantic activation? Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology 11, 177-183.

Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of research in Personality41(4), 731-744.

Lindeman, M., & Svedholm, A. M. (2012). What's in a term? Paranormal, superstitious, magical and supernatural beliefs by any other name would mean the same. Review of General Psychology16(3), 241-255.

Lindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. (2015). Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose. Cognition134, 63-76.

Narmashiri, A., Sohrabi, A., & Hatami, J. (2017). Perceptual-Cognitive Biases in Relation to Paranormal Beliefs: A Comparative Study in Brain Lateralization Groups. Neuropsychology, 2 (7), 79-92. (Persian).

Narmashiri, A., Sohrabi, A., & Hatami, J. (2018). Perceptual Processing in Paranormal Beliefs: A Study of Reaction Time and Bias. social cognition, 6 (2), 122-134. (Persian)

Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition123(3), 335-346.

Pizzagalli, D., Lehmann, D., & Brugger, P. (2001). Lateralized direct and indirect semantic priming effects in subjects with paranormal experiences and beliefs. Psychopathology34(2), 75-80.

Prike, T., Arnold, M. M., & Williamson, P. (2017). Psychics, aliens, or experience? Using the Anomalistic Belief Scale to examine the relationship between type of belief and probabilistic reasoning. Consciousness and cognition53, 151-164.

Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., & Nuortimo, A. (2013). Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non‐believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology27(2), 150-155.

Van Elk, M. (2013). Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics. Consciousness and cognition22(3), 1041-1046.