عصب روان شناسی

با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن عصب روان‌شناسی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اثربخشی آموزش نوروفیدبک بر توجه مداوم، حافظه کاری و ادراک دیداری - حرکتی در دانش‌آموزان مبتلا به اختلال یادگیری خاص

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی علوم اعصاب شناختی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 دکتری تخصصی روانشناسی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثربخشی نوروفیدبک بر توجه مداوم، حافظه کاری و ادراک دیداری - حرکتی در دانش‌آموزان مبتلا به اختلال یادگیری خاص بود. روش پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر از نوع آزمایشی با طرح پیش‌آزمون- پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل کلیه دانش‌آموزان مقطع ابتدایی شهر تبریز بود که در این میان تعداد 30 نفر با تشخیص اختلالات یادگیری در مراکز اختلالات یادگیری شهر تبریز به روش نمونهگیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند و با روش تصادفی ساده در گروههای آزمایش و کنترل (15 نفر در هر گروه) جایگزین شدند. دو گروه‌ آزمونهای عملکرد مداوم، ان - بک و آزمون دیداری - حرکتی بندر گشتالت را به عنوان پیش‌آزمون پسآزمون تکمیل کردند. نوروفیدبک طی 20 جلسه 30 الی 45 دقیقهای (3 بار در طول هفته به مدت هفت هفته) در گروه آزمایش اعمال شد و گروه کنترل مداخلهای دریافت نکردند. داده‌ها با استفاده از تحلیل کواریانس چندمتغیره در نرم‌افزار SPSS.20 تحلیل شدند. یافتهها: بین میانگین نمرات پیشآزمون و پسآزمون گروه آزمایش و کنترل در متغیرهای توجه مداوم (001/0=p) و ادراک دیداری - حرکتی (001/0=p) تفاوت معنیداری وجود دارد؛ بدین معنا که آموزش نوروفیدبک بر بهبود توجه مداوم، حافظه کاری و ادراک دیداری - حرکتی موثر بود. نتیجهگیری: استفاده از نوروفیدبک در بهبود توجه مداوم و ادراک دیداری - حرکتی در دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی مبتلا به اختلال یادگیری خاص توصیه میشود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effectiveness of Training of Neurofeedback on Continuous Attention, Working Memory and Visual - Motor Perception in Primary School Students with Specific Learning Disability

نویسندگان [English]

  • Lila Noshad 1
  • Ami Azizi 2

1 Ph.D. Student in Cognitive Neurociences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 PhD in Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Background:The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of neurofeedback on continuous attention, working memory and visual - motor perception in primary school students with specific learning disorder. Methods: The current study was an experimental type with a pre-test-post-test design with a control group. The statistical population of this research included all primary school students in Tabriz city, among them, 30 people diagnosed with learning disorders in Tabriz learning disorders centers were selected by purposive sampling method and using randomly were replaced into experimental and control groups (15 people in each group). In all two groups of N-back, continuous performance test and visual perception -motor Bender-Gestalt as pretest and post-test completion. Neurofeedback was performed in the experimental group for 20 sessions of 30-45 minutes (3 times a week for seven weeks) and the control group received no interventions. Data were analyzed by using multivariate covariance analysis in SPSS.20. Results: There is only a significant difference between the average pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental and control groups in the variables of continuous attention (p=0.001) and visual-motor perception (p=0.001). This means that neurofeedback training was effective in improving continuous attention, working memory and visual-motor perception. Conclusion: The use of neurofeedback is recommended in improving continuous attention and visual-motor perception in elementary school students with special learning disorders.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Neurofeedback
  • Continuous Attention
  • Work Memory
  • Visual and Motor Perception
  • Learning Disorder
  • Students
مراجع
Albaret, J.M., & Chaix, Y. (2012). Neurobiological bases and neurophysiological correlates of developmental coordination disorders. Neurophysiol Clin, 42,11-7.
American Psychiatric Association. (2018). DSM-5. IV: American Psychiatric Association:41-44.
Azizi, A. (2018). Comparison of the effect of cognitive rehabilitation, neurofeedback and cognitive - behavioral play therapy on continuous attention performance, working memory and visual - motor perception in students with specific learning disorder. (dissertation). Lorestan: Lorestan University. [In Persian]
Azizi, A., Mir Drikvand, F., & Sepahvani, M.A. (2017). Comparison of cognitive rehabilitation, neurofeedback and cognitive - behavioral play therapy on visual – motor perception in primary school students with specific learning disability. Neuropsychology, 3(2):101-116. [In Persian]
Azizi, A., Mir Drikvand, F., & Sepahvani, M.A. (2017). Comparison of cognitive rehabilitation, neurofeedback and cognitive - behavioral play therapy on working memory in primary school students with specific learning disability. 6th the Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Congress. Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences. [In Persian]
Azizi, A., Mir Drikvand, F., & Sepahvani, M.A. (2018). Comparison of the Effect of Cognitive Rehabilitation and Neurofeedback on Sustained Attention Among Elementary School Students with Specific Learning Disorder: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 43, 301–307.
Balouti, A., Bayat, M.R., & Alimoradi, M. (2012). Relationship between visual perception and reading disability in primary students (first, second, third grade) of Ahwaz city. Intrnational Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 3(10):2091-96. [In Persian]
Behzadi, F., Rahimi, C.H., & Mohamadi, N. (2015). The Effect of Neurofeedback on Mathematical Calculation Ability in Primary School Students with Dyscalculia. Journal of exceptional children,15(3):5-17. [In Persian]
 Bayrami, M., Movahedi, Y., & Ahmadi, E. (2017). The effectiveness of Cognitive Rehab on the Selective – divided attention and working memory in students with dyslexia &Dyscalculia disabilities. Neuropsychology.3(2):9-28. [In Persian]
Brandenburg, J., Klesczewski, J., Fischbach, A., Schuchardt, K., Büttner, G., & Hasselhorn, M. (2015). Working memory in children with learning disabilities in reading versus spelling: searching for overlapping and specific cognitive factors. J Learn Disabil, 48(6):622-34.
Facoetti, A., & Molteni, M. (2000). Is attentional focusing an inhibitory process at distractor location? Cognitive Brain Research, 10,185–188.
Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A.N., Ruffino, M., Lorusso, M.L., Cattaneo, C., Molteni, M., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Multisensory spatial attention defi- cits are predictive of phonological decoding skills in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1011-25.
Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., & Gall, J.P. (2021). Educational research: an introduction. 13nd ed. USA: Longman Publishing, 451-452.
Gholizadeh, Z., Babapuor-kheiraldin, J., Rostami, R., Bayrami, M., & Poursharifi, H. (2011). Effects of neurofeedback on visual memory. J Behav Sc, 4, 285-9. [In Persian]
Hadianfard, H., Najarian, B., Shokrkon, H., & Mehrabizade, M. (2001). Fabrication of the Persian form of continuous performance test. Journal of Psychology, 4, 404-388. [In Persian]
Jahani, M., Pishyareh, E., Haghgoo, H.A., Hosseini, S.A., & Ghadamgahi Sani, S.N. (2016). Neurofeedback effect on perceptual-motor skills of children with ADHD. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal; 14(1):43-50.
Khayyer, Z., Nejati, V., & Fathabadi, J. (2014). The effects of stress on working memory among students with high & low academic achievement. J Res Behave Sci, 12,391-405. [In Persian].
Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Ressearch Reviwes, 29,169-95.
Maehler, C., & Schuchardt, K. (2016). Working memory in children with specific learning disorders and/or attention deficits. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 341-347.
Marzocchi, G. M., Ornaghi, S., & Barboglio, S. (2009). What are the causes of the attention deficits observed in children with dyslexia? Child Neuropsychology, 15(6), 567–581.
Moll, K., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., Bruder, J., & Schulte-Korne, G. (2014). Specific learning disorder: Prevalence and gender differences. PLoS ONE, 9(7):1–8..
Monastra, V.J., Lynn, S., Linden, M., Lubar, J.F., Gruzelier, J., & LaVaque, T.J. (2005). Electroencephalographic biofeedback in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 30, 95–114.
Mosanezhad Jeddi, E., & Nazari, M.A. (2013). Effectiveness of EEG-Biofeedback on Attentiveness, Working Memory and Quantitative Electroencephalography on Reading Disorder. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci, 7(2):35-43.
Movahedi, Y. (2016). The effectiveness of neuropsychological rehabilitation on improving the performance of neuropsychological and brain wave pattern in people with dyscalculia and dyslexia (dissertation). Tabriz: Tabriz University. [In Persian].
Nazari, S., Sayahi, H., & Afroz, G.H. (2013). Comparing the visual – motor perception of normal children with learning disibilities using bender geshtalt test. Journal of Learning Disibilities, 3,116 -135. [In Persian]
Nejati, V. (2015). The Designing and Normalization of Attention Registration Test in Children. J Res Behav Sci, 13, 519-24. [In Persian]
Oftadeh Hall, M., & Movahedi, Y. (2016). The Effect of Neurofeedback Training on the Improvement of Continuous Attention. Social Cognition, 5, 7-17. [In Persian]
Passolunghi, M.C. (2006). Working memory and arithmetic learning disability. In T. P. Alloway, & S. E. Gathercole (Eds.),Working memory and neurodevelopmental disorders (pp. 113–138). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Piotrowski, C.H. (2016). Bender-Gestalt Test Usage Worldwide: A Review of 30 Practicebased Studies. SS J. Proj. Psy. & Ment. Health, 23, 73-81.
Raz, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Sadeh, A., & Dan, O. (2014). Reliability and Validity of the Online Continuous Performance Test Among Young Adults. Assessment, 21,108-118.
Scharnowski, F., Rosa, M.J., Golestani, N., Hutton, C., Josephs, O., Weiskopf, N., et al. (2014). Connectivity changes underlying neurofeedback training of visual cortex activity. PLoS ONE; 9(3): e91090.
Van, Leeuwen, M., Van denBerg, S.M., Hoekstra, R.A., & Boomsma, D.I. (2007). Endophenotypes for intelligence in children and adolescents. Intelligence, 35, 369-80.
Weber, M.C. (2009). The IDEA Eligibility Mess. Buffalo Law Review; 57.
عصب روان شناسی
دوره 9، شماره 33 - شماره پیاپی 33
مرداد 1402
صفحه 21-29
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار