عصب روان شناسی

با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن عصب روان‌شناسی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

عصب حکمرانی: بررسی نقطه تلاقی علوم اعصاب و حاکمیت شرکتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار، گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه (س) قم، ایران.

10.30473/clpsy.2025.72782.1763

چکیده

هدف: حاکمیت شرکتی نقش بسزائی در تامین منافع سهامداران و سایر ذینفعان دارد. در همین راستا، عصب حکمرانی با به‌کارگیری علوم مختلف تلاش دارد به شرکت‌ها در موفقیت سازمانی و تامین منافع تمامی ذینفعان کمک کند. بنابراین هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی نقش عصب حکمرانی به‌عنوان نقطه تلاقی علوم اعصاب و حاکمیت شرکتی است.  روش: به‌لحاظ روش، پژوهش حاضر توصیفی-همبستگی و از نوع مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری است. جامعه آماری شامل مدیران شرکت‌های تولیدی، و حجم نمونه آماری 171 نفر بود. داده‌های مورد نیاز از طریق پرسشنامه و به روش نمونه‌گیری گلوله برفی گردآوری شد. تجزیه‌تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری انجام شد.  یافته‌ها: بنابر نتایج پژوهش هر چهار متغیر مستقل (عصب حسابداری، عصب اقتصادی، عصب اخلاقی و طبیعت انسانی) بر عصب حکمرانی اثرگذار بودند. بدین معنا ‌که عصب حسابداری نقش مهمی در تصمیم‌گیری‌های اقتصادی مدیران دارد. عصب اقتصادی کمک می‌کند تا مدیران بتوانند از منابع کمیاب استفاده بهینه و حداکثری کنند. عصب اخلاقی نقش بسزائی در تبیین تصمیمات اخلاقی مدیران دارد. شناخت و درک صحیح طبیعت انسانی می‌تواند مانع بروز رفتارهای غیراخلاقی و سوء مدیریتی شود. نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد عصب حکمرانی با ارائه دیدگاه‌های جدید و کارآمد می‌تواند باعث بهبود رویه‌های حاکمیت شرکتی و قضاوت‌های تجاری شود. درمجموع مطالعه مغز انسان و عوامل موثر بر آن می‌تواند نقش بسزایی در درک بهتر فرآیندهای تصمیم‌گیری سازمانی ایفا کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Neuro-Governance: Exploring the Intersection of Neuroscience and Corporate Governance

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Nazaripour

Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Purpose: Corporate governance plays a crucial role in protecting the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. In this context, neuroscience seeks to assist companies in attaining organizational success and safeguarding the interests of all stakeholders by utilizing insights from various scientific disciplines. Consequently, the aim of this research is to explore the role of neuro-governance at the intersection of neuroscience and corporate governance. Method: This study is practical in nature and is classified as descriptive-exploratory correlational research. The population comprises managers from manufacturing companies, with a sample size of 171 participants. Data were collected through a questionnaire, utilizing the snowball sampling method. The study was carried out during the third quarter of 2024, and the data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Findings: The research findings demonstrate that all four independent variables—neuro-accounting, neuro-economics, neuro-ethics, and human nature—have a significant impact on neuro-governance. Neuro-accounting plays a vital role in guiding managers' financial and economic decision-making processes, while neuro-economics assists managers in optimizing the allocation of scarce resources. Neuro-ethics are essential for understanding and explaining the ethical decisions made by managers, and a thorough comprehension of human nature can aid in preventing unethical behavior and misconduct within organizations. Conclusion: The results of this research indicate that neuro-governance can improve corporate governance practices and business decision-making by providing new and more effective approaches. Overall, examining the human brain and the factors that influence it can significantly contribute to a deeper understanding of organizational decision-making processes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Neuro-Governance
  • Neuro-Accounting
  • Neuro-Economics
  • Neuro-Ethics
  • Human Nature
مراجع
Abreu, J. L. (2010). Neuroeconomics: A Basic Review. Revista Daena: International Journal of Good Conscience, 5(1). http://www.spentamexico.org/v5-n1/5(1)175-184.pdf
Adina, R. (2002). Neuroethics for the new millennium: Commentary. Neuron, 35, 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00763-8
Ahmad, Z. A. (2010). Brain in business: the economics of neuroscience. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 17(2), 1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3216154/
Anand, S., Mishra, K., Verma, V. and Taruna, T. (2023). Financial literacy as a mediator of personal financial health during COVID-19: A structural equation modelling approach. Emerald Open Research, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-04-2023-0006
Arulanandam, B. V. (2020). An exploratory study on current corporate governance among practitioners in Malaysian public listed companies-an introduction to quantum governance. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 13077-1397. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V2418/PR281296
Banda, M. (2023). Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Analysis. Corporate Governance, 14(17). https://doi.org/10.7176/RJFA/14-17-05
Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological bulletin, 126(6), 925. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925
Beauregard, J. (2019). Philosophical Neuroethics: A Personalist Approach. Natl. Catholic Bioethics Q. 18, 269–290
Berthoz, S., Grèzes, J., Armony, J. L., Passingham, R. E., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Affective response to one's own moral violations. Neuroimage, 31(2), 945-950. –950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.039
Blavatskyy, P. (2020). Expected discounted utility. Theory and Decision, 88(2), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-019-09718-3
Borgia, F. (2005). Corporate governance & transparency role of disclosure: how prevent new financial scandals and crimes. American University Transnational Crime and Corruption Center School of International Service, 1-59.
Brocas, I. (2012). Information processing and decision-making: evidence from the brain sciences and implications for economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(3), 292-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.06.004
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2004). Neuroeconomics: Why economics needs brains. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 555-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00377.x
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Avon Books, a Division of the Hearst Corporation
Dickhaut, J. W., Basu, S., McCabe, K. A., & Waymire, G. B. (2009a). Neuro-Accounting, part I: The primate brain and reciprocal exchange. Part I: The Primate Brain and Reciprocal Exchange. Brooklyn, NY: SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1336526
Dickhaut, J. W., Basu, S., McCabe, K. A., & Waymire, G. B. (2009b). Neuro-Accounting, part II: Consilience between accounting principles and the primate brain. Part II: Consilience between Accounting Principles and the Primate Brain. Brooklyn, NY: SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1336517
Dickhaut, J., Basu, S., McCabe, K., & Waymire, G. (2010). Neuroaccounting: Consilience between the biologically evolved brain and culturally evolved accounting principles. Accounting Horizons, 24(2), 221-255. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.2.221
Eslinger, P. J., & Damasio, A. R. (1985). Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: patient EVR. Neurology, 35(12), 1731-1731. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.35.12.1731
Etzioni, A. (1988). The Moral Dimension: Towards a New Economics. New York, NY: The FreePress.
Farmer, D. J. (2006). Neuro-Gov: neuroscience and governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28(4), 653-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2006.11029560
Farmer, D. J. (2007). Neuro‐Gov: Neuroscience as Catalyst. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1412.002
Farmer, D. J. (2008). Invited essay: epistemic pluralism and neuroscience. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30(3), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2008.11029643
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (p. 197). Springer Nature.
Hamza, M. (2018). The impact of corporate governance on auditors' independence and audit fees: An empirical study of Jordanian insurance companies listed on Amman Stock Exchange. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 10(4), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v10n4p171
Hang, Y., Sarfraz, M., Khalid, R., Ozturk, I., & Tariq, J. (2022). Does corporate social responsibility and green product innovation boost organizational performance? A moderated mediation model of competitive advantage and green trust. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 5379-5399. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2026243
Hauser, M. (2006). Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York, NY: Ecco/HarperCollins Publishers
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing, 277-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2019). The neuro-philosophical case for an evolutionary turn in neuroeconomics. Brooklyn, NY: SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402426
Ivascu, L., Pavel, C. D., Sarfraz, M., Arulanandam, B. V., & Tan, H. Y. (2022). An exploratory study on corporate governance from neuro-governance lenses in the Malaysian context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 911907. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911907
Glannon, W. (2017). The evolution of neuroethics. Debates about Neuroethics: Perspectives on its development, focus, and future, 19-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54651-3_3
Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(12), 517-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
Grover, S. L., & Hui, C. (1994). The influence of role conflict and self-interest on lying in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 295-303. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25072533
Kalenscher, T., & Pennartz, C. M. (2008). Is a bird in the hand worth two in the future? The neuroeconomics of intertemporal decision-making. Progress in neurobiology, 84(3), 284-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.11.004
Kalenscher, T. (2009). Decision-Making and Neuroeconomics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0021397
Le Garrec, G. (2018). Fairness, social norms and the cultural demand for redistribution. Social Choice and Welfare, 50, 191-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1080-6
Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In Advances in experimental social psychology, 34, 199-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.004
Masli, A. M. (2018). The Role of the audit committee as a corporate governance mechanism: The case of the banking sector in Libya. Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3906663
Mendez, M. F. (2006). What front temporal dementia reveals about the neurobiological basis of morality. Medical hypotheses, 67(2), 411-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2006.01.048
Moll, J., Eslinger, P. J., & Oliveira-Souza, R. D. (2001). Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task: preliminary functional MRI results in normal subjects. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 59, 657-664. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2001000500001
Moore, D. A., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Conflict of interest and the intrusion of bias. Judgment and Decision making, 5(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500002023
Mudrik, L. (2009). Sandra Aamodt and Sam Wang, Welcome to your brain: Why you lose your car keys but never forget how to drive and other puzzles of everyday life. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(2), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.2.11mud
Namazi, M., Ebrahimi, F. (2017). Investigating the effect of individual and social constructs on the perceived moral intensity by accountants. Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2(4), 97-121. (IN Persian)
Nazaripour, M. Zakizadeh, B. (2023). The role of neuroaccounting in financial and budget decisions-making. Journal of Neuropsychology, 9(33), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.30473/CLPSY.2024.69293.1718 (In Persian)
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill
Patterson, D. M., & Pardo, M. S. (Eds.). (2016). Philosophical foundations of law and neuroscience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743095.001.0001
Platt, M. L., & Huettel, S. A. (2008). Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty. Nature neuroscience, 11(4), 398-403. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2062
Randall, E., & Schumacker, E., & Lomax, R.G. (2015). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modelling. 4th Edition, Routledge, London, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749105
Rasool, S. F., Samma, M., Wang, M., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). How human resource management practices translate into sustainable organizational performance: the mediating role of product, process and knowledge innovation. Psychology research and behavior management, 1009-1025. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S204662
Rasool, S. F., Wang, M., Zhang, Y., & Samma, M. (2020). Sustainable work performance: the roles of workplace violence and occupational stress. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(3), 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030912
Rasool, S. F., Wang, M., Tang, M., Saeed, A., & Iqbal, J. (2021). How toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: The mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(5), 2294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052294
Reynolds, S. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.737
Reynolds, S. J., Leavitt, K., & DeCelles, K. A. (2010). Automatic ethics: the effects of implicit assumptions and contextual cues on moral behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 752. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019411
Rifki, O., & Ono, H. (2021). Fairness norm through social networks: a simulation approach. Computational Social Networks, 8, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40649-021-00100-4
Saltaji, I. M. (2018). Corporate governance: a general review. Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 13, 56-63. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ath/journl/v50sy2018i4p56-63.html
Salvador, R., & Folger, R. G. (2009). Business ethics and the brain: Rommel Salvador and Robert G. Folger. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20091911
Sarfraz, M., Shah, S. G. M., Ivascu, L., & Qureshi, M. A. A. (2022). Explicating the impact of hierarchical CEO succession on small‐medium enterprises' performance and cash holdings. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(2), 2600-2614. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2289
Serra, D. (2021). Decision-making: from neuroscience to neuroeconomics—an overview. Theory and Decision, 91(1), 1-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-021-09830-3
Shah, S. G. M., Sarfraz, M., & Ivascu, L. (2021). Assessing the interrelationship corporate environmental responsibility, innovative strategies, cognitive and hierarchical CEO: a stakeholder theory perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2061
Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sense-making-intuition model. Academy of management review, 32(4), 1022-1040. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26585677
Steele, L. M., Rees, R., & Berry, C. M. (2023). The role of self-interest in unethical pro-organizational behavior: A nomological network meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109 (3). https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001139
Tabibnia, G., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Fairness and cooperation are rewarding: evidence from social cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1412.001
Tehran Stock Exchange. (2022). Corporate governance guidelines for publishers registered with the Tehran Stock Exchange. Octobor 10, 2022. (In Persian)
Teixeira, J. F., & Carvalho, A. O. (2024). Corporate governance in SMEs: a systematic literature review and future research. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(2), 303-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2023-0135
Thagard, P. (2007). The moral psychology of conflicts of interest: Insights from affective neuroscience. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(4), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633105520957638
Tiep Le, T., & Nguyen, V. K. (2022). The impact of corporate governance on firms’ value in an emerging country: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility and organisational identification. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2018907. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.2018907
Trettenbrein, P. C. (2015). Neuroscience and human nature: Review of The Altruistic Brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00307
Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of management Review, 11(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.2307/258313
Turluev, R., & Hadjieva, L. (2021). Neural networks in corporate governance systems. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 93, p. 03016). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219303016
Zwart, T., & Mündlein, K. (2013). Business and the Brain: Discourses on Neuroscience in Business in the Management Consulting Industry. Lund: Lund University School of Economics and Management.
عصب روان شناسی
دوره 10، شماره 37 - شماره پیاپی 37
مرداد 1403
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار